Nowadays it's still being refined, with some companies adding AI to the process. Much more than smudging, AFAIK it all started with Seam Carving & Retargeting org/wiki/Seam_carving ], around 2005 - 2007, where very basically parts of the image can be stretched or compressed with minimal visual impact. unless they have done something remarkable, the 'Removal' is not much more than smudging, still needing corrective software afterwards." There's also Adobe's Digimarc com/photoshop/using/digimarc-copyright-protection.html ] & potentially CAI org/ ]. That said, AI enlarging can sometimes work wonders. AFAIK most just limit the rez of watermarked photos they post online, e.g., the stock services, because that's about all they can do. they make it easy for people to steal copyrighted photos."įWIW, cars with the doors locked still get broken into & stolen - locks keep honest people honest. It is unlawful to place a watermark of any type on NASA images. NASA images are not for free use to any country in the world of course. NASA is funded by Congress, and the money comes from citizens of the U.S., and therefore U.S. NASA does not put a watermark on images because it is an agency of the U.S. >"Even NASA in most cases doesn't put a watermark on their pictures." Photo Stamp Remover cannot remove that type of watermark. If the image is not listed to be part of the domain in which it is found, the user of the service is alerted. The entire Internet is scanned (like search engines do) to locate images with their embedded watermark. Successful photographers may use a service like Digimarc, which can hide the watermark, but any portion of the digital photo or even a printed version can be detected using special equipment or an app. its main purpose is to keep an honest person honest. A watermark is like a lock it can be broken. It is often provable by showing how the original was from a part of a film roll or as a digital image taken from a specific camera, and other circumstantial evidence. Without that watermark, the original photographer would not be able to "easily" prove it was their work. It is common for them to place a watermark on their photos because, with the advent of the Internet, it is too easy for crooks to "steal" their good work and claim it as their own. Professional photographers make a living selling their photographs to all types of media, but they are not claiming the photos are "a world-renowned masterpiece," merely and hopefully, a photo that may fit a need to illustrate an article (or other visual media). >".a simple sunset picture or bees on flower gets a watermark as the individuals look at it as a world renowned masterpiece."
0 kommentar(er)
